Index provider MSCI may bar companies holding crypto assets exceeding 50% of total value from its benchmarks, threatening MicroStrategy’s $61 billion Bitcoin position and billions in potential outflows. This article examines how the January decision could reshape corporate crypto strategies and institutional investment flows.
Looking at cryptocurrency prices live on Binance shows over 9,030 digital assets tracked with a total market capitalization of $3,149.54 billion. As more companies load their balance sheets with Bitcoin and other digital assets, index providers face tough decisions about how to classify these hybrid businesses.
MicrStrategy, now rebranded as Strategy, exemplifies that dilemma. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and CEO Phong Le pushed back hard against MSCI’s exclusion proposal in a 12-page letter dated Wednesday, calling the plan “misguided” and “harmful.” Strategy holds roughly $61 billion in Bitcoin, representing more than 85% of its enterprise value. MSCI plans to decide by January 15 whether companies whose crypto holdings exceed 50% of total assets get kicked from its indexes.
Billions In Passive Cryptocurrency Outflows At Stake
JPMorgan Chase analysts warned last month that as much as $2.8 billion could exit Strategy if MSCI moves forward. Billions more might follow if other index providers adopt similar rules. But the bank believes exclusion risk is already priced into Strategy’s share price, making the upcoming decision a potential upside catalyst despite inevitable passive outflows from index funds.
Strategy’s executives argue the 50% threshold “arbitrarily singles out digital asset businesses for uniquely unfavorable treatment.” Companies with comparable exposures to oil, timber and gold face no such restrictions. And the proposed limit ignores price volatility plus other factors central to balance-sheet accounting, according to the letter.
Political Environment Shifts Under Trump Administration
Saylor and Le invoked President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto stance in their objections. Exclusion would “run in direct conflict with the pro-innovation policies of the current administration,” they wrote, citing Trump’s executive order promoting digital financial technology growth. Blocking digital asset treasury companies would undermine federal goals while “stifling innovation, impeding economic development, and harming national security.”
Strategy insists it differs materially from an investment fund. Based in Tysons Corner, Virginia, the firm “actively uses the Bitcoin it holds to create returns for shareholders,” making it more than just a wrapper for cryptocurrency. Value creation happens through technological innovation and strategic Bitcoin deployment, not passive holding.
Digital Asset Treasury Model Shows Cracks
Strategy helped define the digital asset treasury playbook starting in 2020. Other companies from Peter Thiel’s ventures to the Trump family piled into similar models as share prices skyrocketed. Most have now fallen sharply. Many companies are worth less than the digital tokens they own.
Some crypto firms have turned to fractional leadership to navigate regulatory and operational challenges without full-time executive costs. According to Bureau of Labour Statistics data, fractional roles rose 57% from 2020, with particular growth in compliance, risk, and operations positions within fintech and crypto sectors.
Falling Bitcoin prices also amplify the pressure on these treasury models. When crypto values drop, the gap between market capitalization and underlying asset value widens further. Companies that leveraged their balance sheets to acquire more Bitcoin face compounded risk during extended drawdowns.
Strive Asset Management, another Bitcoin treasury co-founded by former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, echoed Strategy’s arguments. Chairman Matt Cole wrote that Strive provides investor value based on Bitcoin returns. “These new business models may succeed or fail, like any enterprise,” Cole stated. “However, an index provider’s purpose is not to take a view, but to accurately reflect the equity universe.”
December Crypto Data Stabilizes Pressure
Market volatility softened through late December as total crypto capitalization climbed back toward the $3.00 trillion mark. A recovery followed a sharp November slide where values dipped over 15% amid shifting Federal Reserve expectations. Richard Teng, Binance CEO, noted on December 3 that “institutions are coming in in a big way, and the allocation is still very small at this juncture. The best is yet to come.” Overall, the mood in the market has become more optimistic as more money is being invested, leading to an increase in trading activity. Data from Binance shows that as the year comes to an end, many traders are suddenly eager to invest in high-growth stocks after being cautious for several months. This renewed confidence in bold investment strategies has driven these more unpredictable stocks up as the year wraps up. Treasury-heavy firms stabilized after seeing share price declines earlier in the quarter.
Index Neutrality Sustained Following MSCI Decision
Benchmarking giants backed down from their exclusion threat on January 6, sparing crypto-heavy firms from a brutal wave of forced selling. Keeping the rules as they are means indexes will continue to reflect the real-world market instead of punishing boards for unconventional treasury moves.
February 2026 is the next date on the calendar for a deeper dive into how non-operating businesses fit into the mix. Fund managers finally have a clear view of their benchmark standing while the crypto world waits to see how the new administration handles regulation. Trying to drive a wedge between digital asset firms and standard equities seems to be a dead issue for the time being.
Corporate boards can stop sweating over whether to dump their Bitcoin or get booted from major indexes. Passing the mid-January deadline without a single forced liquidation saved the digital asset treasury model for at least one more season. Even if some companies still toy with the idea of hiving off their tokens into separate shells, the panic to rebuild entire business models has evaporated. Inclusion in global benchmarks looks safe for the foreseeable future, letting CEOs get back to business.
Keep an eye for more latest news & updates on Tribune!
